Greenpeace recently took credit for the PrintNightmare exploitation, warning that if the world does not shift to paperless immediately, further devastating actions will be taken.
Jokes (and conspiracy theories) aside, for the past couple of weeks, we’ve all heard more about printing vulnerabilities than we ever wanted.
The Windows Print Spooler service runs by default on every Windows host, including domain controllers, allowing users to print. What seems like a harmless service has become a critical weak point, leaving enterprises exposed to severe security risks.
This is yet another example of IT tools being turned against us. Just as PowerShell has been leveraged for fileless attacks, the print spooler service is now a vehicle for privilege escalation and remote code execution (RCE).
Microsoft, in an effort to retain user-friendly print management, created an exploitable security loophole.
By now, we are all used to Patch Tuesday. But the PrintNightmare vulnerability pushed security teams to the breaking point, forcing multiple emergency patches.
Between 2020 and 2021, several vulnerabilities were discovered in the print spooler/fax code, including:
Analyzing the chain of events of recent PrintNightmare vulnerability:
Confused? So is everyone else. And attackers aren’t giving up—organizations will need to defend against PrintNightmare for years to come.
At this point, you might expect me to say: Patch, patch, patch!
But that’s not the takeaway. The “Einstein insanity” of endlessly finding and patching vulnerabilities isn’t solving the problem.
Earlier this year, it was Microsoft Exchange ProxyLogon.
Then, PrintNightmare.
Next, it was PetitPotam NTLM Relay attacks.
Yesterday, it was Azure Cosmos DB.
Tomorrow, it’ll be another vulnerability.
If we focus only on isolated vulnerabilities, we miss the bigger picture.
Inspecting a vulnerability in silo will not reduce the organization’s true risk as critical context is missing. Let’s take an example:
A risk-based approach allows security teams to prioritize threats that pose real risks—not just the ones marked as “critical” by a scanner.
As expected, ransomware groups have weaponized PrintNightmare. Why?
Ransomware operators thrive on low-effort, high-impact exploits, and PrintNightmare is exactly that.
While your organization debates whether to go paperless, attackers are scanning for unpatched systems.
Remember: Knowing whether you’re exposed is important and knowing the potential impact of an attack is critical.
To outmaneuver attackers, organizations must move beyond siloed asset management, checklist-based vulnerability scanning, and traditional red teaming or bi-yearly penetration testing. These approaches, while valuable, often fail to provide a real-time understanding of security gaps. Instead, security teams should adopt a continuous validation strategy that tests real-world attack paths, emulates adversary tactics, and prioritizes vulnerabilities based on their actual exploitability rather than theoretical risk scores.
Security isn’t about checking off patches—it’s about knowing if your defenses can withstand an attack.
Start today. Get a demo of how Pentera validates, prioritizes, and remediates the PrintNightmare vulnerability—mapping every possible attack path.
PrintNightmare is a critical Windows vulnerability that affects the Windows Print Spooler service. Attackers can exploit it to achieve remote code execution (RCE) and privilege escalation, potentially taking full control of affected systems.
Yes, while Microsoft has released patches, PrintNightmare remains a security concern because: 1. Many organizations have not fully implemented patches or mitigations 2. Attackers continue to find workarounds and new exploit techniques 3. Disabling the Print Spooler service is not always a viable option for businesses. To mitigate the risk, organizations should integrate automated security validation to test if their systems remain vulnerable.
Disabling the Print Spooler can mitigate PrintNightmare risks, but it may disrupt printing functionality. Organizations must weigh: Security benefits (reducing attack surface) vs. operational impact (affecting printing-dependent workflows). For high-security environments, attack surface reduction strategies—including disabling unnecessary services—are highly recommended.
To verify exposure, security teams should: 1. Check Windows Update to confirm patch installation 2. Run penetration tests to determine exploitability 3. Leverage automated security validation to simulate real-world attack scenarios.
Stopping the Print Spooler service will: Prevent PrintNightmare exploits, block unauthorized remote printing, disable local and network printing. Organizations that rely on printing should adopt alternative security measures, such as network segmentation and least privilege access.
Begin your journey in security validation and see why leading companies trust us with their cybersecurity validation.